Does the printer or the publisher bear the responsibility for shingling a saddlestitch book?
Question:
I have a 104 page tabloid magazine (50# text) that requires saddlestitching. Knowing this will require adjustments for shingling, who would normally bear the responsibility, the publisher or the printer?
Answer:
As with all printed pieces, overall responsibility for the end result is
always shared. The publisher must be responsible for knowing the technical
specifications for every piece, which includes any "push-out" or "shingling"
requirements. After all, they are the ones actually designing the pages. The
printer's responsibility is to make sure the information is available and
accurate and that the finished job falls within the specified parameters.
In today's publishing world, designers often like to get the maximum impact
from every page, and tend to force content to the limit. That means the
shingling requirements must be an integral part of the design. On a 104 page
book, you may have an eighth of an inch or more difference in the trim of
the center of the book and the outside pages. That much trim can play havoc
with the design elements if it is not taken into account from the outset.
At the same time, printers know exactly what the specifications for each
page must be based on signature size and paper weight and should be checking
the pages as part of the quality control process from the minute the job
hits production. Many printers establish fixed rules, such as "no live
content can be within .XXX inches of trim." Such rules are often part of the
contract, and the publisher ignores such rules at their own peril. Some
printers burn a mask in the proofing process to clearly show if anything
falls outside the specifications. Anything that falls within the masked area
is subject to being trimmed off.
Most printers use automated imposition software which figures out the amount
of creep for each page and automatically compensates for shingling in the
imposition process. These programs help eliminate the chance for human
error, but nothing is foolproof. Obviously the printer must bear
responsibility for any machine or operator error.
Designers sometimes feel as though the printer's specifications are
overbroad. For example, a catalog printer may specify that anything within
1/4 inch of the edge of the sheet be subject to trim. It is certainly true
that the printer's own quality control is normally much better than that,
but when you are running a high speed web press and automated in-line
binding, there needs to be a fairly substantial margin of error.
For the protection of both the publisher and printer, these specifications
should be put in writing and be an integral part of any contract.
Stephen Beals is a digital pre-press manager and has been writing for major print publications for many years. He is the author of A Practical Primer for Painless Print Production. He can be reached at stephenbeals@mac.com.
© Copyright Print Buyers Online.com, Inc.